Physiology of Coronary Blood Flow Dr Sandeep Mohanan,

Physiology of Coronary Blood Flow Dr Sandeep Mohanan,

Physiology of Coronary Blood Flow Dr Sandeep Mohanan, Department of Cardiology, Medical College, Calicut. OUTLINE Introduction Coronary microcirculation, resistance beds & autoregulation

Endothelium dependent vasodilation CBF during exercise Physiology of CBF across a stenosis Measurement of CBF Physiologic assessment of CAD- noninvasively and invasively Coronary collateral circulation CBF abnormalities with normal coronary vessels INTRODUCTION

The resting coronary blood flow ~250ml/min (0.8ml/min/g myocardium=5% of COP) Myocardial oxygen consumption --- balance between supply and demand According to Ficks principle, oxygen consumption in an organ is equal to the product of regional blood flow and oxygen extraction capacity. The heart is unique in having a maximal resting O2 extraction (~70-80%) So, MVO2 = CBF * CaO2 Thus, when systemic oxygenation is stable, the oxygen supply is determined by the coronary blood

flow The coronary blood flow is unique: Helps generate the systole (cardiac output) & simultaneously gets impeded by the systole it generates. At systole Arterial flow is minimum: directed from the subendocardium to the subepicardium; and the coronary venous outflow is maximum

Diastole The coronary inflow is maximum BASIC PHYSICS OF FLOW Bernoullis principle Daniel Bernoulli (Swiss scientist) studied fluid dynamics and postulated in his book, Hydrodynamica, that for an inviscid flow an increase in the speed of the fluid occurs simultaneously with a decrease in pressure or a decrease in the fluid's potential energy.

LAW OF CONSERVATION OF ENERGY {Total energy = Kinetic energy + Potential(Pressure) energy} - May explain in part the increase in flow during diastole Hagen-Poisseuilles equation: -Gives the pressure drop for a viscous liquid( in laminar flow) as it flows through a long cylindrical pipe -Corresponds to the Ohms law for electrical circuits (V=IR)

-Thus halving the radius of the tube increases the resistance by 16 times Principles were also extended to turbulent flow and helped derived the Darcy-Weisbach equation and the Reynolds number DETERMINANTS OF CORONARY RESISTANCE Flow is determined by the segmental resistance and therefore an understanding of the resistance beds is necessary:

3 resistance beds R1 R2 R3 R2( Microcirculatory resistance) 20- 200m Small arteries and arterioles Capillaries: ~ 20% of R2 ( even if capillary density doubles, perfusion increases by only 10%)

R3( Compressive resistance) - time varying - Increased in heart failure In the subendocardium R3increases but R2 decreases. So, transmural flow is normally uniform. Broadly 2 compartments of coronary resistance: 1) Epicardial conduit vessels no pressure loss

2) Resistance vessels -- < 300m -- gradually dissipating m -- gradually dissipating pressure till 20-30 mmHg Coronary driving pressure = Aortic root pressure LVEDP The interactions of coronary driving pressure and the coronary resistance are coordinated so as to maintain a constant flow for a given workload. ---- CORONARY AUTOREGULATION CORONARY AUTOREGULATION

Maintenance of a constant regional coronary blood flow over a wide range of coronary arterial pressures when determinants of myocardial oxygen consumption are kept constant. Below the lower limit: flow becomes pressure dependent Under optimal circumstances this lower threshold is a mean pressure of 40mmHg. Sub-endocardial flow compromise: <40mmHg Sub-epicardial flow compromise: <25mmHg

-Due to higher resting blood flow in subendocardium and effects of systole on subendocardial coronary reserve The threshold increases with increased determinants of oxygen consumption. Even as constant flow is maintained at a constant work load; -- As the workload increases, the oxygen consumption proportionately increases.

-- The increase in MvO2( Demand) needs a proportionate increase in coronary flow ( Supply). -- This increase in CBF is directed by endothelium related flow mediated dilatation as well as by various mediators that decrease coronary resistance. CORONARY MICROCIRCULATION A longitudinally distributed network with considerable spatial heterogeneity of control mechanisms.

Each resistance vessel needs to dilate in an orchestrated fashion. Resistance As (100 -400m) - shear stress + m) - shear stress + myogenic Arterioles (<100 m) - shear stress + m) metabolic Capillaries- 3500/mm2 P (Pressure drop) occurs b/w 50 - P (Pressure drop) occurs b/w 50 -

200mm Heterogeneity of microcirculatory auto-regulation: When driving pressure decreases, Autoregulation causes arterioles<100m -- gradually dissipating m dilate where as larger resistance arteries tend to constrict due to a decrease in perfusion pressure. However metabolic vasodilation which is triggered shows a homogenous response.

Transmural penetrating arteries: Not influenced by metabolic stimuli. Blood flow driven by coronary driving pressure, flow mediated vasodilation and myogenic regulation. Significantly influences the subendocardial blood flow MEDIATORS OF CORONARY RESISTANCE

PHYSICAL FORCES METABOLIC MEDIATORS NEURALCONTROL PARACRINE FACTORS Physical forces These are intraluminal forces: 1) Myogenic regulation:

Ability of the vascular smooth muscle to oppose changes in coronary arteriolar diameter Probably due to stretch activated L-type Ca channels Primarily in <100microm Significant role in coronary autoregulation

2) Flow mediated vasodilatation: Coronary diameter regulation in response to changes in local shear stress. Kuo et al Endothelium mediated- NO, EDHF Occurs in both conduit (?hyperpolarisation) as well as resistance arteries (NO mediated) Metabolic mediators Adenosine:

- Cardiac myocytes during ischemia ( ATP hydrolysis) T-half of 10sec A2a receptors - cAMP : Ca2+ activated K-channels Direct action on <100m vessels Indirectly on resistance arteries and conduit arteries : endothelium-dependent 1) Hypoxia 2) Exercise induced myocardial ischemia

K+-ATP channels - Contributes to resting coronary tone - It is actually a common effector pathway of several other mediators Hypoxia - However a direct vasodilatory mechanism is lacking Acidosis and arterial hypercapnoea:

NEURAL CONTROL- Cholinergic innervation -Endothelium dependent and flow mediated vasodilatory effects also NORMAL CORONARIES ATHEROSCLEROSIS RESISTANCE


CONSTRICTION (Muscarinic constrictive + Endo-dep & flow mediated vasodilatory) NEURAL CONTROL- Sympathetic innervation - Sympathetic denervation does not affect resting flow


ATTENUATED DILATION CONDUIT ARTERIES NET DILATION (2 dilation+ 1 constriction + 1 consumption)

(2 dilation + endo-dep & flow mediated dilation+ 1 constriction) CONSTRICTION PARACRINE MEDIATORS Released from epicardial arterial thrombi following plaque rupture SEROTONIN


Resistanc e constriction dilation Resistanc e constrictio constrictio n

n THROMBOXANE constriction constrictio A2 n constrictio constrictio n n

ADP dilation dilation attenuated attenuated THROMBIN

dilation dilation constrictio constrictio n n BRADYKININ

dilation dilation attenuated attenuated HISTAMINE dilation

dilation attenuated attenuated ENDOTHELIUM DEPENDENT MODULATION OF CORONARY TONE A functional endothelium is the major determinant in the normal physiological effects of physical, metabolic, neural and paracrine factors on the coronary tone.

Nitric oxide (NO) Endothelium dependent Hyperpolarising factor (EDHF) Prostacyclins Endothelins Nitric Oxide Molecule of the year in 1992 Robert F. Furchgott, Louis J. Ignarro and Ferid Murad received Nobel prize for Physiology/Medicine in 1998

L-arginine + 3/2 NADPH + H+ + 2 O2 = citrulline + NITRIC OXIDE + 3/2 NADP+ Action: It increases cGMP levels : Decreased i.c Ca levels -Its effects are enhanced by increased shear stress of flow Exercise : Chronic upregulation of NO synthase CVD risk factors Increase oxidative stress(superoxide) inactivates NO EDHF

Shear stress induced vasodilation Opens K+ channels vasodilation Probably metabolites of arachidonic acid by the CYP pathway ? Epoxyeicosatrienoic acid ? Endothelium derived hydrogen peroxide PROSTACYCLIN:

-Arachidonic acid metabolism via cycloxygenase pathway Important in collateral vascular resistance ENDOTHELINS: - prolonged vasoconstictor response ETa and ETb receptors Regulates blood flow only in pathophysiological states. VARYING SENSITIVITIES OF THE MICROCIRCULATION TO STIMULI

Pharmacological Vasodilation Nitroglycerin: Vasodilation in conduit and resistance arteries No effect in nomal coronary arteries due to autoregulatory mechanisms Improves subendocardial perfusion: 1) Compensates for impaired endo-dependent mechanisms

2) Dilates collateral vessels 3) Reduces LV end-diastolic pressure Calcium Channel blockers: Vasodilation of conduit and submaximal action on resistance vessels ( Therefore rarely precipitate subendocardial ischemia ) Adenosine & agonists : Regadenoson (A2) Dipyridamole

Papaverine: 1st agent used for coronary vasodilation Increases cAMP by inhibiting phosphodiesterase A newer mechanism for coronary blood flow Davies et al (Circulation 2006) : Pushing waves and Suction waves Pushing waves : Proximal to distal push- forward

- pushes blood till the conduit vessels Suction waves: Distal to proximal suction effect - backward - main determinant of diastolic flow CBF DURING EXERCISE ACUTE EXERCISE: Increases afterload, contractility, LV wall stress, tachycardia and oxygen demand

Proportional increase in myocardial blood flow (2 to 4 fold) mainly through a decrease in R2 and flow mediated dilation. However in presence of a coronary stenosis the increase in R1 overruns the decrease in R2 above a threshold, causing stress induced ischemia. PROLONGED EXERCISE TRAINED HEART: The CBF is maintained or increases

PHYSIOLOGY OF CBF ACROSS A CORONARY STENOSIS Consequence of a coronary obstruction due to CAD: 1) Increased resistance in an epicardial artery due to stenosis 2) Abnormal microcirculatory control The flow across a stenosis is determined by the P-Q relationship Perfusion of territory distal to a stenosis ------------ DISTAL CORONARY PRESSURE

In normal coronaries : R2> R3>> R1 In CAD : R1 > R3 > R2 R1 increases with stenosis severity and impairs flow Ideal stenosis P-Q relationship According to Bernoullis principle and law of conservation of energy. The total energy = KE + PE; i.e E V V2 + PE The flow across a stenosis (Flow= A * mean velocity)

Thus V V 1/D2 . -Therefore in 50% stenosis, V- 4 times and KE- 16times. - The PE proportionately decreases and is lost as (P)P) DISTAL PRESSURE LOSS Post stenosis: V comes back to normal Therefore KE decreases to pre-stenosis values PE thus becomes (prestenotic PE)- P)P i.e =Pd P)P= Viscous losses + Separation losses + Turbulence Viscous losses = f1 Q , f1 (Viscous coefficient = 8L/ AL/ AL/ A s2 ) (Hagen-Poiseuille equation)

Separation losses= f2 Q2, f2 (Separation coefficient= /2[1/As-1/An]2 ) m -- gradually dissipating - viscosity of blood - density of blood L - length of stenosis As - CSA of stenotic segment An - CSA of normal segment Flow to distal territory = Pd- venous pressure Thus the pressure drop across a stenosis varies directly with

the length of the stenosis and inversely with fourth power of the diameter. Therefore overall resistance and thus distal pressure is determined mainly by cross sectional area of the stenosis increases exponentially Resistance is also flow dependent ( square of flow)

Abluminal outward remodelling : No effect on P-Q characteristics Inward remodelling : Significant longitudinal pressure drop MEASUREMENT OF CORONARY BLOOD FLOW Earlier microsphere radionuclide techniques were considered gold standard. Presently, regional myocardial blood flow can be quantitated

non-invasively equally accurately using MRI, CT and PET. Resting CBF 0.7-1ml/min/g However a resting CBF gives little information This may be normal in HCM, CAD, DCMP etc due to inherent adjusting mechanisms. It is the CBF in a stressed heart that brings out the true quality of the coronary vasculature. STRESS Pharmacological / Physiological

Noninvasive flow measurements MRI, Doppler echo and Dynamic PET (Nuclear Perfusion studies) Require measurements of the myocardial tissue tracer concentrations and its kinetics. FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF CAD - Noninvasive 1) Vasodilator stress: - Adenosine 140g/kg/min for 4 min( Dypiridamole 560g/kg/min)

Induces hyperemia and makes CBF dependent on driving pressure and the residual resistance 3 to 5 times flow (2-4ml/min/g) Exposes the minimum coronary vascular resistance of the system Noninvasive methods may measure either the relative flow (compared to normal regions)or the absolute flow The concept of Coronary flow reserve pioneered by Lance Gould is

central to the functional assessment of CBF across a stenosis. Coronary reserve : Ability to increase CBF above resting value by maximum pharmacologic vasodilation (4 to 5 fold) Parameters that may affect CFR: - HR preload

afterload contractility systemic oxygen supply Flow in the maximally vasodilated heart is pressure dependent. Thus CFR indirectly shows the consistency of the driving coronary pressure uptill the distal territory Relative Flow Reserve

= Regional perfusion of a segment/ Perfusion in normal segment during maximal pharmacological vasodilation/exercise Compares under same hemodynamic conditions Independent of HR and MAP More lesion specific than the AFR --- correlates with FFR Limitations: - Requires a normal reference segment--- ? Diffuse CAD Low sensitivity requires relatively large differences in regional flow The uptake of nuclear tracers may not be proportionate in both

regions Not much prognostic data available Absolute Flow Reserve = Maximal vasodilated flow in a region of interest/ Resting flow of same region. - Normal AFR ~ 4-5 Clinically significant impairment if <2 AFR incorporates functional importance of a stenosis + microcirculatory

dysfunction Limitations: - Altered by factors affecting resting flow also (Hb, HCM, Hemodynamics etc) Instantaneous hemodynamic conditions of the values are different Cannot specify the importance of the epicardial lesion alone Correlation with stenosis severity decreases with more extensive CAD 82 quantitativePET scan before and after dipyridamole stress in a patient with nificant triple vessel disease- showing inferior and inferolateral ischemia

- Vasodilator stressing is also dependent on the changes in extravascular resistive forces (HR, contractility,SBP) --- Thus exercise induced vasodilation causes a lesser flow increase than pharmacological -- Endothelium mediated vasodilation contributes significantly to pharmacological vasodialtion (eNOS inhibition causes ~ 18% decrease in flow reserve & a 21% decrease in vasodilatory capacity)

2) Positive inotropic stress : Dobutamine infusion Similar to exercise induced mechanisms Around 200 to 300% increase in flow 3) Sympathetic stress : Cold pressor test - Targets endothelium mediated determinants of resistance Adrenergically mediated vasoconstrictor effects are balanced by endothelium-related vasodilator forces affecting both the

microvasculature and the epicardial vessels. ~ 38% increase in MVO2 (rate-pressure product) & ~30% increase in CBF. In early CAD causes actually a decrease in CBF due to unopposed vasoconstrictor responses ( Highly sensitive) Limitations of CAD assessment by noninvasive testing: Conceptual limitations:

Suboptimal accuracy in assessing intermediate epicardial lesions Limited spatial resolution ( esp in complex lesions) ?Several stenosis within same artery ? Multivessel disease Uncertainty about exact perfusion territory

Practical limitations: Needs referral to another department and related delays Not possible when an immediate on-table decision is required Number of acute presentations increasing Additional financial commitments

Functional assessment of CAD- Invasive AFR and RFR can also be derived by invasive measurements Fractional Flow Reserve(FFR) Brought forward by Pijls et al who demonstrated that it is the maximum hyperemic distal coronary pressure that determines the ischemic potential of a lesion. The FFR is the fraction of maximal CBF that goes through the stenotic vessel, expressed as a percentage of blood flow through the same artery in the theoretical

absence of the stenosis. FFR = Pd Pv/ Pa Pv = Pd/ Pa, when Pv is taken as 0. Normal value for FFR= 1 FFR Measurement Pressure wire with a sensor 3 cm from from tip of a 0.014inch guide wire

Maximum hyperemia is a prerequisite Adenosine IV infusion(140ug/Kg/min) or Intra coronary (60ug for left coronary and 30ug for right coronary) Clinical equivalence of FFR Idea is to measure pressures to assess blood flow An FFR of 0.9 = Only 90% of maximal CBF is able to cross the lesion An FFR of 0.71 = 71% of maximal CBF crosses lesion

When a PTCA has changed the FFR from a baseline of 0.5 to 0.9, there has been an additional 40% increase in maximal CBF Clinical significance of FFR Need for FFR in addition to CAG? Decision making for intermediate lesions

Decision regarding mutivessel PCI Serial lesions Diffuse disease Ostial or distal LM and ostial RCA lesions Side branch lesions ISR Prior MI Assess PCI results FFR for assessing PCI results

Eg: PCI for RCA serial stenosis AFR vs RFR vs FFR Advantages of FFR - Independent of HR, SBP & driving pressure. - A lesion specific index and independent of status of microcirculation Independent of contribution by collateral flow Highly reproducible when compared to AFR Superior to quantitative CAG and IVUS in physiological assessment.

Offers excellent physiological correlates in a world of coronary anatomy Limitations of CFR assessment Maximum hyperemia is mandatory for assessment Assumptions : 1) Coronary venous pressure is 0, 2) P-Q relationship is linear

FFR cut-off of 0.75 is derived from a stable population with SVD and normal LV function not universally applicable to all scenarios. Pitfalls of pressure measurement need to be avoided Wedging of the guide catheter (0.16mm 2 ) may alter absolute pressure measurements in critical stenosis Limited data for acute MI Clinical validation of invasive measurement

- comparison with noninvasive sress testing DEFER study ( JACC 2010) FAME study (JACC 2010) FAME 2 trial (NEJM 2012)) Bruyne, Pijls et al FFR-guided PCI vs Medical therapy in stable CAD FFR guided PCI +OMT vs OMT significantly decreased the

need for urgent revascularisation In patients with FFR>0.8 best outcomes were attained with OMT alone. IVUS vs FFR comparison IVUS- best anatomical information of a lesion FFR- best physiological information of a lesion One cannot be a substitute for the other for in-depth

assessment of complex lesions Takagi et al demonstrated that an IVUS minimal lumen area <3.0 mm2 and an area stenosis <60% had 100% predictive accuracy for a FFR < 0.75. (Circulation.1999;100:250 255) Hanekamp et al found IVUS and FFR>0.94 had 91% concordance in the identification of optimal stent apposition and deployment. (Circulation. 1999;99:10151021)

CORONARY COLLATERAL CIRCULATION Collaterals develop as a result of arteriogenesis promoted by a chronic coronary occlusion that causes a pressure gradient between the proximal and distal beds in a serial direction Shear stress acts on preexisting collaterals < 200m Growth factors (VEGF) NO mediated Capillaries in ischemic region proliferate little impact on perfusion Tremendous individual variability in the development and function of

collaterals. A sudden thrombosis developing in a chronic critical stenosis may still be minimally destructive RECRUITABLE COLLATERALS Collateral Flow Index (CFI) = FFR beyond a lesion after full occlusion (balloon); CFI > 0.25 have a better prognosis

-Collateral resistance is tonically regulated by NO and prostaglandins ABNORMAL CBF WITH NORMAL CORONARY ARTERIES MICROCIRCULATORY IMPAIRMENT As discussed earlier the CFR decreases with 1)Tachycardia (decreased diastolic time), 2) Increased preload ( compressive determinants) 3) Increased afterload 4) Increased contractility

5) Decreased Oxygen supply ( anaemia, hypoxia) 6) Abnormal endothelium (DM, HTN, DLP, CTDs) CONDUIT VESSEL DYSFUNCTION: - A longitudinal perfusion gradient develops from base to apex ( Base flows ~ 20% more than apex) - Endothelial dysfunction, Vessel stiffness, Outward vascular remodelling and diffuse luminal narrowing

ANGINA with NORMAL CORONARIES Risk factor reduction has been found to significantly improve the CFR in several studies Thank you Multiple Choice Questions 1) The oxygen extraction ratio of the myocardium is : a) b)

c) d) e) 100% 90% 80-90% 70-80% 60-70%

2) A 75% simple stenosis in a coronary blood vessel would increase the flow resistance by: a) 24 times b) 48 times c) 64 times d) 128 times e) 256 times 3) Subepicardial coronary flow becomes compromised at

coronary pressures less than: a) 20mmHg b) 25mmHg c) 30mmHg d) 35mmHg e) 40mmHg 4)Microcirculatory vasodilation in response to increased flow requirements chiefly occur at vessels:

a)<50micm b)50-200micm c)200-400micm d)>400micm e) Similar contributions at all levels 5) One of the following mediator has a significant endothelium independent vasodilatory effect on normal coronary vasculature: a)Bradykinin

b) Cholinergic innervation c) ADP d) Adenosine e) Thrombin 6) The Hagen-Poiseuille equation focuses on the effect of: a) b) c) d)

e) Pressure conservation as total energy is conserved Total pressure lost as potential energy Pressure drop due to viscous losses Pressure drop due to separation losses Pressure drop due to turbulence losses 7) Flow to the distal territory of a stenosis is determined

by: a) Pa-Pd b) Pa-Pv c) Pd-Pv d) Pa only e) Pv only 8)Main advantage of FFR over AFR in physiological assessment of CAD is:

a) It gives anatomical data as well as physiological data b) It correlates better with the severity of CAD c) It has a better prognostic value d) It is lesion specific e) It provides information on microcirculation also 9) FAME 2 strategy (conclusion) in managing a epicardial lesion in CSA patients is a) PTCA to patients with >70% stenosis improves mortality

b) PTCA based on FFR values has a mortality benefit compared to that based on angiographic criteria alone. c) PTCA based on FFR values decreases urgent revascularisation compared to based on angio criteria alone d) PTCA by FFR guided vs angio-criteria alone showed no significant differences 10) Based on available data, the best results following POBA and PTCA based on FFR criteria are when they are

respectively greater than: a) o.75 and 0.90 b) 0.90 and 0.94 c) 0.94 and 0.90 d) 0.90 and 0.75 e) 0.75 each

Recently Viewed Presentations

  • Think of 1 idea about what could be

    Think of 1 idea about what could be

    England was divided into four Earldoms; Wessex, Northumbria, Mercia and East Anglia. Danegeld- a tax paid to the Vikings to stop them plundering England. Fealty - loyalty . L/Os: Explain who Edward the Confessor was and his links to the...
  • Module 2 - Santa Fe College

    Module 2 - Santa Fe College

    Digital Video Disc or Digital Versatile Disc (DVD) DVD is an optical media standard that can be used to store large amounts of different types of data (computer data, video, audio). ... The NTFS file system automatically detects bad sectors...
  • OWASP AppSec 2004 Presentation

    OWASP AppSec 2004 Presentation

    Phase 2 Update on Attacks and Vulnerabilities Ryan Barnett, WASC Officer Director of Application Security Training, Breach Security [email protected]
  • Robust Optimization Concepts and Examples

    Robust Optimization Concepts and Examples

    Robust Optimization Concepts and Examples Yuriy Zinchenko Shane G. Henderson ORIE, Cornell University Outline What can go wrong with LP? A familiar blend problem The general picture Robust linear programming Software, resources, practicalities Radiation therapy for cancer treatment What can...
  • Universal Credit: 28/04/2018 Robert Thompson Southwark How can

    Universal Credit: 28/04/2018 Robert Thompson Southwark How can

    Digital Support Drop-in. Drop-in sessions across multiple locations including: The Green, Nunhead. Blue Anchor Library. Leathermarket. JMB. Neckinger. TRA
  • Emergency Medicine

    Emergency Medicine

    S: sats 80%. Action?? He needs resus, call ambulance, OXYGEN!! O2 administration for a very sick patient like this one, choose highest % mask available. Eg non-rebreather with one valve removed (80%), partial rebreather (60%),, venturi (28-45%) Nasal prongs alone...
  • Risk Management Plan - Pharmaceutical Conferences

    Risk Management Plan - Pharmaceutical Conferences

    OMICS International Conferences. OMICS International is a pioneer and leading science event organizer, which publishes around 500 open access journals and conducts over 500 Medical, Clinical, Engineering, Life Sciences, Pharma scientific conferences all over the globe annually with the support...
  • An intelligent tutoring system to support student and teacher ...

    An intelligent tutoring system to support student and teacher ...

    Il progetto i-TUTOR Il progetto europeo I-TUTOR (Intelligent Tutoring for Lifelong Learning) ha avuto lo scopo di creare un ITS per supportare l'attività di progettisti, docenti/tutor e studenti nella didattica online A questo scopo i prototipi realizzati sono stati testati...