Contracting Officer Podcast Slides Knowledge & Insights From

Contracting Officer Podcast Slides Knowledge & Insights From

Contracting Officer Podcast Slides Knowledge & Insights From Contracting Officers 1 Episode 067 Why Acquisition Planning Matters Original Air Date: Feb 21, 2016

Hosts: Kevin Jans & Paul Schauer 2 Formatting notes Hyperlinks: Blue font indicates hyperlinks presentation must be in Slide Show mode to activate the link Red bold font indicates a point of emphasis Green bold font indicates COs personal comment or perspective 3

Introduction Acquisition is a team sport So is Acquisition Planning As previously noted, the process has players who have to keep up with their part of the process This podcast explains what problems can arise when the acquisition team doesnt plan well 4 When do Clauses happen?

Acquisition Time Zones (from Podcast Episode 003) Requirements Zone Market Research Zone RFP Zone Source Selection Zone (or sole source) Execution Zones: Kick Off, Transition (Ramp Up), Performance, Re-compete 5 Acquisition Planning takes time The contract award is the last step in a long process

The Acquisition Time Zones can take a while If the government team assumes the process can be sped up, it creates all kinds of issues Traffic effect Poorly defined requirements Boilerplate RFPs (proposal development is rushed) Poor competition (Source Selection is rushed) Award is rushed (Actual contact award done correctly, or in time) 6 Acquisition Planning takes time

This tends to be a big issue on recurring requirements, like services All of this leads to mission impact And increased costs to industry as they swirl (and therefore to the Government, and you as a taxpayer) 7 Acquisition Planning One example Shelley Hall, Skyways Community Relations Lead, wrote a blog post about the Government Accountability Office (GAO)s sustained protest based on the agencys failure to engage in reasonable advance planning

This is a huge decision! (see the GAO decision here) Very frustrating when key players fail to plan Like pulling teeth to get complete requirements packages Even for known requirements (like follow-ons to existing contracts) Apparently the GAO has had enough excuses, and will hold Program AND Contracting Offices accountable for ensuring they adequately plan acquisitions Failure to plan is not an excuse to award a sole source contract. 8 The Story - Background Gary received the initial contract award years ago in a competitive acquisition

Three years ago the Agency awarded a sole-source logical follow-on task order to Gary, permitting him to continue the services The Limited Source Justification (LSJ) basically stated that no one other than the incumbent could perform without disruption, transition delays, duplication of costs, and new costs LSJ also stated that the logical follow-on contract was intended to be limited to 3 years (which is probably how they got it through the lawyers) The Story Background Steve protested this logical follow-on sole-source award to Gary

GAO denied the protest, finding the Agencys concerns regarding the risks associated with transitioning to a non-incumbent contractor to be reasonable 3 years later, the agency issued a new RFQ to replace Garys sole-source award The agency evaluated the proposals and selected Steve Gary protested the award Government re-evaluated the proposals and GAO dismissed the protest The Story Current Issue Gary filed a second protest (more sour grapes) GSA re-evaluated proposals again; GAO again dismissed the protest March 27, 2015:

CO signed a modification to the sole-source task order (set to expire in days) Extended the performance period of that task order by up to two years in order to accomplish transition activities No formal justification for the extension of the task order was prepared The Story Further Developments Program Manager (PM) sent an email to the CO: Requested cancellation of twice-protested RFQ In order to develop a new acquisition Because the Program Office has identified additional factors and requirements that our customers have indicated should be included in the

solicitation. Almost three months after extension modification, the Head of the Contracting Agency (HCA) signed an LSJ authorizing the CO to extend the sole-source task order, basically repeating that Gary was the only one able to do the work The Story Final Outcome The agency then published the notice of extension to the sole-source task order and cancelled the RFQ Steve filed a protest of the cancellation GAO agreed with the protestors attestations that both the extension of the task order and cancellation of the RFP were due to the agencys failure to

plan The records show that the agency knew four years ago (when it justified and defended its prior award of a sole-source task order) of the need for a new acquisition The Story - Summary The GAO agreed with Steves protest of the agencys attempt to avoid competition The GAO decision admonished the agency to repeat the solicitation and evaluation, with proper planning this time The agency also should compensate Steve for proposal preparation costs

incurred in responding to the cancelled solicitation, as well as reasonable costs of filing and pursuing the protest, including reasonable attorneys fees Hollow victory for Steve: He recouped costs, but still doesnt have award, and must compete again Why is Acquisition Planning Important? Time matters Government contracting must comply with regulations, thus taking more time This is not a "gotcha" story It's evidence for the CO to give to their customer that this is a TEAM sport

This happens when the requirement gets overwhelmed by things like The traffic effect Personnel transition (ex.: CO leaves in middle of acquisition) Either way we cant throw up our hands and make a sole source award 15 Why is Acquisition Planning Important? It is easy to say "you can't just award the contract because you didn't plan The problem with this argument is that there isn't really another option: The customer needs it; The CO has to buy it.

Period. 16 Why Should Government Care? Mission Impact! Your time and budget will be impacted by protests if you don't plan for future efforts Understand that contractors will now protest your sole source "we aren't ready for a competition" justifications This is why we talk about acquisition planning so much

17 Why Should Industry Care? A new avenue to hold the Government accountable A new impediment to holding on to your current work A new complication to just about every re-compete effort

The third order of magnitude effects: Need for more people to work the acquisition (planning and execution) Need for more experience in conducting the acquisition Need for fewer protests (please!) May lead to holding protestors accountable for frivolous protests Its the other side of the coin 18 Summary Government team: GAO may formally hold you accountable for failure to conduct acquisition

planning in timely manner Likelihood of protests increases Focus on your acquisition planning Industry team: GAO appears to want to help by holding Government accountable (but the law of unintended consequences applies) Be ready for more protests Be ready for more competition 19 Contact us

We are on LinkedIn, Twitter and Facebook We also started the Government Contracting Network Group on Facebook. Join us there! Send your topics to [email protected] For Community support, contact Shelley Hall at [email protected] 20

Recently Viewed Presentations

  • Elkins High School

    Elkins High School

    After receiving a gift. When someone has given you their time, advice, or support. ... Handwritten notes are always best but if you choose not to send a handwritten thank you note, you should always at least send an email...
  • Distributed Inference in Sensor Networks

    Distributed Inference in Sensor Networks

    Gaussian process (GP) - Intuition Gaussian processes for sensor placement Entropy criterion (c.f., [Cressie '91]) A Ã ; For i = 1 to k Add location Xi to A, s.t.: Entropy criterion (c.f., [Cressie '91]) We propose: Mutual information (MI)...
  • Register to be a Husker Dialogues Facilitator

    Register to be a Husker Dialogues Facilitator

    Husker Dialogues Facilitator Training 2019. Introduce first-year students to importance of dialogue at UNL. Model ways to participate in respectful dialogues even when we disagree. Showcase peer leaders & role models .
  • Chapter 3 Effects of IT on Strategy and Competition

    Chapter 3 Effects of IT on Strategy and Competition

    Use information technology to provide entertaining shopping experience to mothers, name brand goods, unique and difficult-to-find off-brands, at substantial discounts. 45% of sales occur over mobile devices. Curated sales. Point of case: You should learn to assess, evaluate, and apply...
  • PresentationPowerpoint.Com


    contract law chapter 2 contracts act 1950
  • -Northern Cape Progress report on the bucket eradication

    -Northern Cape Progress report on the bucket eradication

    Northern Cape - Progress report on the bucket eradication to the Portfolio Committee 10 October 2007 Bucket eradication in formal settlements Buckets = 6,846 Funds received = R 65,2M Bucket eradication Out of 19 Municipalities only 1 Reported that Bucket...
  • The Misjudgment of Risk due to Inattention Human,

    The Misjudgment of Risk due to Inattention Human,

    Attention & Effort Required to Drive a Ford Model-T (1908) Ford. Model. A. The . Ford. Model. T (colloquially known as the Tin Lizzie, T‑Model . Ford, Model. T, or . T ... Peltzman. Effect: risk-tolerant driver responds to driver-safety...
  • Anaphylaxis - FK UWKS 2012 C

    Anaphylaxis - FK UWKS 2012 C

    ANAPHYLAXIS. In a few seconds it was extremely ill; breathing became distressful and panting; it could scarcely drag itself along, lay on its side, was seized with diarrhea, vomited blood and died in twenty five minutes.